Impact of FSHB and FSHR Genes Polymorphisms on Hormonal Profile and Sperm Retrieval Outcome in Men With Klinefelter Syndrome: A Clinical–Genetic Predictive Study

Abstract

Background: Genetic variability within the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)-related genes might contribute to phenotypic heterogeneity in patients with Klinefelter syndrome (KS), yet its clinical impact on sperm retrieval remains unclear. Objectives: To investigate the association between FSHB c.211 G > T and FSHR polymorphisms (c.2039 A > G and c.29 G > A) and hormonal parameters, as well as their potential role in predicting sperm retrieval rate (SRR) in patients with KS undergoing testicular sperm extraction (TESE). Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort of patients with KS was analyzed. Only subjects not receiving testosterone replacement therapy were included (n = 417). Hormonal, anthropometric, and clinical variables were compared across genotypes using nonparametric tests. Additive genetic models were applied to evaluate allele-dose effects. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of SRR. Predictive performance of clinical and combined clinical–genetic models was assessed using ROC curve analysis. Results: FSHB and FSHR genes polymorphisms were associated with variations in serum FSH concentrations, confirming a modulatory role of the FSH-related genes. In additive modeling, the FSHR c.29 G > A polymorphism emerged as an independent predictor of SRR (adjusted OR: 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09–0.97), whereas FSHB c.211 G > T showed a nonsignificant trend. The inclusion of genetic variants modestly improved predictive accuracy compared with clinical variables alone, as demonstrated by ROC analysis. Discussion and Conclusion: Genetic variants within the genes involved in FSH action might contribute incremental information for the prediction of sperm retrieval in patients with KS. While the overall predictive gain remains moderate, additive genetic modeling highlights a potential allele-dose effect of FSHR c.29 G > A on reproductive outcome, supporting a role for integrated clinical–genetic assessment in this population, although external validation remains required.