Abstract
This paper argues that we have a moral obligation to implement certain health technologies even if we have limited or incomplete evidence of their effectiveness. The focus is on technologies used in non-emergency settings, as opposed to “exceptional cases” such as compassionate use and emergency approvals during public health emergencies. A broadly plausible moral principle – the Ecumenical Principle – is introduced and applied to a test case: the use of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in mammographic screening. The paper concludes by exploring the implications of the Ecumenical Principle for the adoption of other new health technologies.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Rosenqvist, S., Dustler, M., & Brännmark, J. (2025). Health Technologies and Impermissible Delays: The Case of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. Science and Engineering Ethics, 31(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-025-00535-2
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.