Impact of residual regurgitation after aortic valve replacement

Abstract

Objective: Mild-to-moderate aortic regurgitation (AR) is not infrequently encountered after standard aortic valve replacement, and reportedly more often following transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Patients are usually managed by observational follow-up, but the clinical significance and natural history of residual AR are unknown. The goal of this study was to determine its impact on the outcome of these patients. Methods: Between 1992 and 2011, 3201 consecutive patients underwent isolated standard aortic valve replacement in our institution. Of these, 135 patients (4.2%) were found to have paravalvular leak >1/4. Clinical, intraoperative as well as early and late postoperative outcome variables were studied. Factors associated with residual AR and their impact on survival were assessed by multivariate analysis. Results: Mean follow-up was 4.5 ± 3.4 years. The use of a bioprosthesis, longer cardiopulmonary bypass duration and preoperative atrial fibrillation were associated with a higher risk of presenting residual AR. Survival was negatively affected by commonly identified comorbidities (diabetes, stroke, pulmonary disease, renal failure, peripheral vascular disease) but also by the presence of >1/4 residual AR. Survival in the latter group was lower than for patients with ≤1/4 AR at all time points: 91.4 vs 96.7%, 77.5 vs 82.4% and 44.1 vs 54.5% at 1, 5 and 10 years, respectively (P < 0.01). Conclusions: Postoperative residual AR >1/4 is an independent predictor of postoperative mortality and should be considered in the selection of surgical approach and management strategy for patients in need of standard and transcatheter aortic valve replacement. © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.