Abstract
Background: Parenteral nutrition (PN) covering the need for carbohydrates, amino acids, and lipids can either be compounded from single nutrients or purchased as an industrially manufactured ready-to-use regimen. This study compares a commercially available 3-chamber bag (study group) with a conventionally compounded monobag regarding nutrition efficacy, safety, and regimen preparation time. Materials and Methods: This prospective, randomized, single-blind study was conducted at 5 Chinese hospitals from October 2010-October 2011. Postsurgical patients requiring PN for at least 6 days were randomly assigned to receive the study or control regimen. Plasma concentrations of prealbumin and C-reactive protein (CRP), regimen preparation time, length of hospital stay (LOS), 30-day mortality, safety laboratory parameters, and adverse events (AEs) were recorded. Results: In total, 240 patients (121 vs 119 in study and control groups) participated in this study. Changes in prealbumin concentrations during nutrition support ("Prealb(StudyGroup) = 2.65 mg/dL, P
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Yu, J., Wu, G., Tang, Y., Ye, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2017). Efficacy, Safety, and Preparation of Standardized Parenteral Nutrition Regimens: Three-Chamber Bags vs Compounded Monobags - A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Single-Blind Clinical Trial. Nutrition in Clinical Practice, 32(4), 545–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/0884533617701883
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.