Abstract
Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopically-assisted suture anchor repair and transosseous sutures for repair of foveal triangular fibrocartilage complex tears in patients with distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability. Methods: Sixty patients with triangular fibrocartilage complex foveal detachment associated with DRUJ instability were prospectively recruited and randomized into 2 equal groups—the anchor repair group and the transosseous repair group. The primary outcome was DRUJ function after 2 years, which was assessed by the DRUJ evaluating system. The secondary outcomes were grip strength, visual analog scale for pain, Mayo Modified Wrist ScorePatient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score, and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score. Results: There were no significant differences between the groups for any of the outcome measures. Good-to-excellent outcomes (according to the DRUJ evaluation system) were achieved in 27 (90%) patients in the anchor repair group and 26 (86.7%) patients in the transosseous repair group. Fewer complications were observed in the anchor repair group. Conclusions: Both techniques yielded good and comparable outcomes with a lesser incidence of early complications in the anchor repair group. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic II.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Afifi, A., Abdel-Ati, E. A., Abdel-Wahed, M., & Moharram, A. N. (2022). Arthroscopic-Assisted Foveal Reattachment of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears With Distal Radioulnar Joint Instability: A Comparison of Suture Anchors and Transosseous Sutures. Journal of Hand Surgery, 47(6), 507–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.01.021
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.