Comparison of hemagglutination inhibition test and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for determining antibody to rubella virus

9Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The hemagglutination inhibition test (HAI) and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detecting antibody to rubella virus were compared by testing 25 sets of paired sera taken before and after infection and 10 sets of sera taken during acute and convalescent stages of the disease and by screening 700 serum samples from the Collaborative Perinatal Project, NIH/NINCDS. The tests were found to be comparable in their ability to detect positive and negative sera, rises in titers, and seroconversions. When a purified antigen and carefully prepared reagents were used, ELISA was found to be as accurate and reliable as HAI, ELISA required no pretreatment of serum, could easily be automated, and was less time-consuming than HAI.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shekarchi, I. C., Sever, J. L., Tzan, N., Ley, A., Ward, L. C., & Madden, D. (1981). Comparison of hemagglutination inhibition test and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for determining antibody to rubella virus. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 13(5), 850–854. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.13.5.850-854.1981

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free