A Review of Symbolic, Subsymbolic and Hybrid Methods for Sequential Decision Making

6Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the field of Sequential Decision Making (SDM), two paradigms have historically vied for supremacy: Automated Planning (AP) and Reinforcement Learning (RL). In the spirit of reconciliation, this article reviews AP, RL and hybrid methods (e.g., novel learn to plan techniques) for solving Sequential Decision Processes (SDPs), focusing on their knowledge representation: symbolic, subsymbolic, or a combination. Additionally, it also covers methods for learning the SDP structure. Finally, we compare the advantages and drawbacks of the existing methods and conclude that neurosymbolic AI poses a promising approach for SDM, since it combines AP and RL with a hybrid knowledge representation.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Núñez-Molina, C., Mesejo, P., & Fernández-Olivares, J. (2024). A Review of Symbolic, Subsymbolic and Hybrid Methods for Sequential Decision Making. ACM Computing Surveys, 56(11). https://doi.org/10.1145/3663366

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free