LabelFlow: Exploiting workflow provenance to surface scientific data provenance

11Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Provenance traces captured by scientific workflows can be useful for designing, debugging and maintenance. However, our experience suggests that they are of limited use for reporting results, in part because traces do not comprise domain-specific annotations needed for explaining results, and the black-box nature of some workflow activities. We show that by basic mark-up of the data processing within activities and using a set of domain specific label generation functions, standard workflow provenance can be utilised as a platform for the labelling of data artefacts. These labels can in turn aid selection of data subsets and proxy for data descriptors for shared datasets.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alper, P., Belhajjame, K., Goble, C. A., & Karagoz, P. (2015). LabelFlow: Exploiting workflow provenance to surface scientific data provenance. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 8628, pp. 84–96). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16462-5_7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free