Non-animal approaches for consumer safety risk assessments: Unilever's scientific research programme

15Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Non-animal based approaches to risk assessment are now routinely used for assuring consumer safety for some endpoints (such as skin irritation) following considerable investment in developing and applying new methods over the past 20 years. Unilever's research programme into non-animal approaches for safety assessment is currently focused on the application of new technologies to risk assessments in the areas of skin allergy, cancer and general toxicity (including inhalation toxicity). In all of these areas, a long-term investment is essential to increase the scientific understanding of the underlying biological and chemical processes that we believe will ultimately form a sound basis for novel risk assessment approaches. Our research programme in these priority areas consists of in-house research as well as Unilever-sponsored academic research, involvement with EU-funded projects (e.g. Sens-it-iv, carcino-GENOMICS), participation in cross-industry collaborative research (e.g. COLIPA, EPAA) and ongoing involvement with other scientific initiatives on non-animal approaches to risk assessment (e.g. UK NC3Rs, US 'Human Toxicology Project' consortium).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carmichael, P., Davies, M., Dent, M., Fentem, J., Fletcher, S., Gilmour, N., … Westmoreland, C. (2009). Non-animal approaches for consumer safety risk assessments: Unilever’s scientific research programme. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 37(6), 595–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/026119290903700605

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free