Gratitude and that which we cannot return: Critical reflections on gratitude

  • van Hulzen M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Gratitude is often perceived from the perspective of economic reciprocity, i.e., from the simple logic of quid pro quo . It is for this reason that Marcel Mauss ignores the topic of gratitude in his famous work on gift-giving, and that Seneca believes that gratitude is something which is given in return: ‘for the benefit that is accomplished by an act has been repaid by our gratitude if we give it friendly welcome’. In this paper I will demonstrate that gratitude is not something that is given in return or a cancelation of debt. Instead, I will argue for the claim that gratitude is the recognition of that which cannot be returned, which leads, in ideal cases, to a sense of responsibility for the other.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van Hulzen, M. (2021). Gratitude and that which we cannot return: Critical reflections on gratitude. Zeitschrift Für Ethik Und Moralphilosophie, 4(1), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42048-021-00091-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free