Character in Kant's Moral Psychology: Responding to the Situationist Challenge

6Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In recent years, several philosophers have used "situationist" findings in social psychology to criticize character-based ethical theories. After showing how these criticisms apply, prima facie, to Kant's moral theory, I lay out a Kantian response to them. Kant admits the empirical reality of situation-dependence in human actions but articulates a conception of "ought implies can" that vindicates his character-based moral theory in the face of rarity of character. Moreover, he provides an interpretive framework for the situation-dependence of human motivation in terms of humans' "propensity to evil." He also provides a framework for highlighting empirical bases for moral hope, a framework that makes it possible to see lack of character as something human beings can overcome. And he outlines a "moral anthropology" that develops something akin to what Mark Alfano calls "moral technologies," but in Kant's case, these technologies focus on cultivating character as such rather than merely good behavioral outcomes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Frierson, P. (2019, December 1). Character in Kant’s Moral Psychology: Responding to the Situationist Challenge. Archiv Fur Geschichte Der Philosophie. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/agph-2019-4002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free