Enhancing Standardized Practices for Oral Mucositis Prevention in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Best Practice Implementation Project

2Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Oral mucositis (OM) poses a significant challenge in children undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). There is a gap between clinical practice and the evidence, and nursing practices is not standardized. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of applying the evidence for preventing HSCT chemotherapy-induced OM in children and to elevate the nurses’ compliance to the evidence. Methods: Following the clinical evidence practice application model of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) evidence-Based Care Center. The process included reviewing literature, extracting evidence, identifying gaps, developing audit criteria, conducting a baseline audit, creating an action plan, implementing evidence-based interventions, and assessing outcomes. Results: After the evidence implementation, 6 out of 12 audit criteria with poor compliance are significantly improved, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The incidence of OM decreases, with a statistically significant difference (66.6% vs 36.7%, P=0.02). The incidence of grade I, II, III, and IV OM also decreases (30% vs 23.3%, 23.3% vs 13.4%, 10% vs 0%, and 3.3% vs 0%). Ultimately, the standardized oral care practice routine and workflows to prevent OM were established. Conclusion: Bridging the gap between evidence and clinical practice can standardize nurse behavior, decrease the incidence of OM, and lower the OM severity in children undergoing HSCT.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, L., Luo, Y., Long, J., Yin, Y., Fu, Q., Wang, L., & Patil, S. (2024). Enhancing Standardized Practices for Oral Mucositis Prevention in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Best Practice Implementation Project. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 17, 1909–1920. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S471877

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free