Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection in patients aged ≥60 years (EXTEND): Analysis of cost-effectiveness

27Citations
Citations of this article
86Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: The randomized Phase IIIb/IV EXTEND trial showed that extended-pulsed fidaxomicin significantly improved sustained clinical cure and reduced recurrence versus vancomycin in patients ≥60 years old with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Cost-effectiveness of extended-pulsed fidaxomicin versus vancomycin as first-line therapy for CDI was evaluated in this patient population. Methods: Clinical results from EXTEND and inputs from published sources were used in a semi-Markov treatmentsequence modelwith nine health states and a 1year time horizon to assess costs and QALYs. Themodel was based on a healthcare systemperspective (NHS and Personal Social Services) in England. Sensitivity analyseswere performed. Results: Patients receiving first-line extended-pulsed fidaxomicin treatment had a 0.02 QALY gain compared with first-line vancomycin (0.6267 versus 0.6038 QALYs/patient).While total drug acquisition costs were higher for extended-pulsed fidaxomicin than for vancomycin when used first-line (€1356 versus €260/patient), these were offset by lower total hospitalization costs (which also included treatment monitoring and community care costs; €10 815 versus €11459/patient) and lower costs ofmanaging adverse events (€694 versus €1199/patient), reflecting the lower incidence of CDI recurrence and adverse events with extended-pulsed fidaxomicin. Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin cost €53 less per patient than vancomycin over 1 year. The probability that first-line extended-pulsed fidaxomicinwas cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €30000/QALYwas 76%in these patients. Conclusions: While fidaxomicin acquisition costs are higher than those of vancomycin, the observed reduced recurrence rate with extended-pulsed fidaxomicin makes it a more effective and less costly treatment strategy than vancomycin for first-line treatment of CDI in older patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cornely, O. A., Watt, M., McCrea, C., Goldenberg, S. D., & De Nigris, E. (2018). Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection in patients aged ≥60 years (EXTEND): Analysis of cost-effectiveness. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 73(9), 2529–2539. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dky184

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free