A review of prognostic scores after liver resection in hepatocellular carcinoma: The MSKCC, SLICER and SSCLIP scores

10Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Predicting prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) aids clinical decision-making and stratifies patient follow-up plans. There are currently three prognostic scores specific to liver resection of HCC published in the literature: the MSKCC, SLICER and SSCLIP scores. In this review, we highlight the methodology employed in the construction of these scores and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each. Current limitations to prognostic scores include the inability to differentiate between early and late recurrences of HCC, the failure to account for the impact of aetiology of HCC and the assumption that ethnicity has no impact on disease process. Further scientific discoveries in these areas will allow for improvement in prognostication. The SLICER score is currently the most comprehensive. External validation of each score in cohorts of patients with different baseline demographics and clinical characteristics will be required to examine their stability and reliability.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chan, E. E. H., & Chow, P. K. H. (2017). A review of prognostic scores after liver resection in hepatocellular carcinoma: The MSKCC, SLICER and SSCLIP scores. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyw185

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free