Bicameral Grant Review: An Alternative to Conventional Peer Review

  • Forsdyke D
8Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

[Note: Go retrospective + budget evaluation. Forget prospective. Use a sliding scale, top down bqased on rank. to allocate % budget awarded.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Forsdyke, D. R. (1991). Bicameral Grant Review: An Alternative to Conventional Peer Review. The FASEB Journal, 5(9), 2313–2313. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.5.9.1860622

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free