“Fighting the Good Fight”: Why Do Public Defenders Remain on the Job?

13Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this article, we ask why public defenders remain on the job despite a number of unique and testing work-related challenges. To answer this question, we analyze original data collected through 87 semistructured interviews with public defenders from government, nonprofit, and appointed counsel systems across the United States. Participants explicated a set of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations salient to their decision to remain in public defense: interacting with clients, defending the Constitution, fighting social inequality, pursuing personal values, appreciating camaraderie with colleagues, and earning public sector benefits. We discuss how our findings relate to prior research, identify directions for future studies, and tentatively engage policy implications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baćak, V., Lageson, S. E., & Powell, K. (2020). “Fighting the Good Fight”: Why Do Public Defenders Remain on the Job? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 31(6), 939–961. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403419862317

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free