Blowing the whistle: Perceptions of surgical staff and medical students in a public South African hospital

2Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Understanding perspectives on whistleblowing is important in tackling a resistance to speaking out. This study aimed to elicit the views of medical students and doctors in Edendale Hospital, South Africa using a mixed-methods questionnaire study incorporating free text and tick-box answers. Thematic analysis and descriptive statistics were used to interpret the results. Fifty-eight doctors and medical students responded (87% response rate); the majority were surgeons at Edendale hospital. Seventeen percent did not understand the concept of whistleblowing, while 42% felt unable to report an adverse event. Motivation for reporting adverse events was overwhelmingly in the interests of patient safety (91%), but reluctance was mainly due to the potential consequences on workplace relationships (24%). The most common innovation suggested was a reporting structure (54%). These observations indicate workplace relationships are an important barrier to whistleblowing. Further research should expand on these concerns and explore staff knowledge about whistleblowing.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kusu-Orkar, T. E., Symonds, A. L., Bickerstaffe, H. C., Allorto, N., & Oultram, S. (2019). Blowing the whistle: Perceptions of surgical staff and medical students in a public South African hospital. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 4(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2018.071

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free