Evidence-Based Practice in the Treatment of OCD

  • Clement P
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Kazdin (2007, see record 2007-15064-003) and Barlow (2007, see record 2007-15064-004) elucidated the components of evidence-based practice and affirmed the Story of Hope (Clement, 2007; see record #3200715064-002) as an illustration of how such practice can be accomplished within a full-time private practice. These three psychologists agreed on a number of points. Evidence-based practice includes (a) systematic evaluation of individual patients with repeated administration of brief, objective measures before, during, and following treatment, (b) accurate diagnosis in order to select the most appropriate treatment(s) for the patient in question, (c) whenever possible using an empirically supported treatment (EST), (d) relating research findings to clinical practice and outcomes from psychotherapy back to research, (e) adapting treatment components to the particular patient and their specific circumstances, (f) continually analyzing progress, and (g) accumulating treatment outcomes across cases into a database. Finally, regarding the case of Hope herself, although there had been a drop in her level of functioning at a 21-month, post-treatment follow-up, Hope's treatment effect size was still very large (2.57). (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved) (journal abstract)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Clement, P. W. (2007). Evidence-Based Practice in the Treatment of OCD. Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.14713/pcsp.v3i4.913

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free