Abstract
Addressing the familiar Kantian objection that emotions cannot be meaningfully commanded because they are not under ones direct voluntary control, I draw on recent work by Roberts and Blum and analyze compassion as a kind of concern- based construal of a neighbor in distress-- a construal subject (to some extent) to one's will and therefore a possible object of an imperative. I then point out how, on this analysis, "agapeic" compassion differs somewhat from other compassion by the Christian's use of "faith- based" concepts and beliefs in her construals of neighbors in need. (edited)
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Radcliffe, D. (1994). Compassion and Commanded Love. Faith and Philosophy, 11(1), 50–71. https://doi.org/10.5840/faithphil199411113
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.