Clinical triggers: An alternative to a rapid response team

52Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

DHMC's clinical triggers program is a promising approach that addresses an unmet patient need. We have seen dramatic reductions in our non-ICU cardiopulmonary arrest rates, along with our ICU bounceback rates. In the context of our hospital, this program aligns well with our teaching mission while maximizing the resources that are currently available. RRTs are certainly one way to prevent the unnoticed deterioration of patients, but programs such as ours, which focus on prevention of ongoing deterioration, may yield more benefit for the patients in institutions similar to DHMC. Although our study does not alter the weight of evidence in the literature, it does offer a new focus on the afferent limb by clarifying the expectations of the primary responders. This was the essence of the deficiency in the aforementioned case study. Death is the natural, albeit sad, endpoint of all lives; the overarching goal of DHMC's clinical triggers system is to prevent the premature death of a hospitalized patient and thereby improve patient safety.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moldenhauer, K., Sabel, A., Chu, E. S., & Mehler, P. S. (2009). Clinical triggers: An alternative to a rapid response team. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 35(3), 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1553-7250(09)35022-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free