Centering Human Subjects: The Ethics of "desk Research" on Political Violence

38Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Quantitative data about political violence are frequently based on "desk research,"data derived from secondary sources that do not require direct contact between researchers and participants, such as people who witnessed or experienced violence. The research that employs these data is often viewed implicitly as ethically uncomplicated. In contrast, we argue that the production and analysis of political violence data coded from secondary sources require careful ethical deliberation regarding human subjects concerns. We consider two broad classes of quantitative political violence data often gathered through desk research: incident lists and indices. For both types, we identify ethical concerns about how data production and use can affect research participants. We conclude by offering a series of suggestions on how to incorporate ethical considerations about human subjects into the design and evaluation of political violence research based on secondary sources.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hoover Green, A., & Cohen, D. K. (2021). Centering Human Subjects: The Ethics of “desk Research” on Political Violence. Journal of Global Security Studies, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogaa029

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free