The (mis)behavior of behavior analysis storage estimates

30Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper investigates the dependence of estimates of reservoir storage capacity derived using behavior analysis on the length of inflow sequence used for overyear reservoir simulation. It has generally been assumed that simulation using behavior analysis, which incorporates a given probability of failure, will always give steady state estimates of the storage capacity (apart from the effects of the initial reservoir condition). The results reported here show that it may take sequence lengths as much as 1000 years or more for the mean of the distribution of storage capacity estimates to approach a stationary value. For some cases with high draft and high inflow variability, we show that a significant swing of the mean storage estimates from an initial downward bias into an upward bias occurs before their convergence to a stationary level. However, the median storage estimates always showed downward bias which sometimes decreased very slowly with increasing sequence length. We provide explanations for these observations and discuss some of the implications on the choice of inflow sequence length in determining reservoir storage capacities using behavior analysis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pretto, P. B., Chiew, F. H. S., McMahon, T. A., Vogel, R. M., & Stedinger, J. R. (1997). The (mis)behavior of behavior analysis storage estimates. Water Resources Research, 33(4), 703–709. https://doi.org/10.1029/96WR03284

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free