A comparative evaluation of ChatGPT 3.5 and ChatGPT 4 in responses to selected genetics questions

29Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of ChatGPT 4 (GPT-4) in delivering genetic information about BRCA1, HFE, and MLH1, building on previous findings with ChatGPT 3.5 (GPT-3.5). To focus on assessing the utility, limitations, and ethical implications of using ChatGPT in medical settings. Materials and Methods: A structured survey was developed to assess GPT-4's clinical value. An expert panel of genetic counselors and clinical geneticists evaluated GPT-4's responses to these questions. We also performed comparative analysis with GPT-3.5, utilizing descriptive statistics and using Prism 9 for data analysis. Results: The findings indicate improved accuracy in GPT-4 over GPT-3.5 (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McGrath, S. P., Kozel, B. A., Gracefo, S., Sutherland, N., Danford, C. J., & Walton, N. (2024). A comparative evaluation of ChatGPT 3.5 and ChatGPT 4 in responses to selected genetics questions. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 31(10), 2271–2283. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocae128

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free