Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of ChatGPT 4 (GPT-4) in delivering genetic information about BRCA1, HFE, and MLH1, building on previous findings with ChatGPT 3.5 (GPT-3.5). To focus on assessing the utility, limitations, and ethical implications of using ChatGPT in medical settings. Materials and Methods: A structured survey was developed to assess GPT-4's clinical value. An expert panel of genetic counselors and clinical geneticists evaluated GPT-4's responses to these questions. We also performed comparative analysis with GPT-3.5, utilizing descriptive statistics and using Prism 9 for data analysis. Results: The findings indicate improved accuracy in GPT-4 over GPT-3.5 (P
Cite
CITATION STYLE
McGrath, S. P., Kozel, B. A., Gracefo, S., Sutherland, N., Danford, C. J., & Walton, N. (2024). A comparative evaluation of ChatGPT 3.5 and ChatGPT 4 in responses to selected genetics questions. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 31(10), 2271–2283. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocae128
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.