Abstract
Dietrich's discussion is wide ranging. We agree that oil recovery from diatomite rocks is influenced by a variety of mechanisms, that compaction plays a role, and that more work in the area of recovery mechanisms and their representation within a reservoirs simulator is warranted. His critique of our work, however, incorrectly summarizes our experimental procedures and it misrepresents the importance that we attribute to hot-water imbibition in relation to the other mechanisms that contribute to thermal oil recovery. His discussion of the simulation of field-scale recovery processes does not appear to acknowledge the need for upscaling or the inherent nonuniqueness present in history-match results. Our work highlights the role of fines detachment as well as silica and mineral dissolution combined with compressive stress (Schembre et al. 2006; Ikeda et al. 2007; Ross et al. 2008). We have found that rock wettability evolves favorably to a more water-wet state with elevated temperature. This change in wettability contributes positively to recovery.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Kovscek, A. R., Schembre, J. M., & Tang, G. Q. (2008). Author’s reply to discussion of interrelationship of temperature and wettability on the relative permeability of heavy oil in diatomaceous rocks. SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering. Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/93831-RE
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.