Classical medicine v alternative medical practices

16Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Classical medicine operates in a climate of rational discourse scientific knowledge accretion and the acceptance of ethical standards that regulate its activities. Criticism has centred on the excessive technological emphasis of modem medicine and on its social strategy aimed at defending exclusiveness and the privileges of professional status. Alternative therapeutic approaches have taken advantage of the eroded public image of medicine offering treatments based on holistic philosophies that stress the non-rational non-technical and non-scientific approach to the unwell disregarding traditional diagnostic categories and concentrating on enhancing subjective comfort and well-being but remaining oblivious to the organic substrate of disease. This leads to questionable ethics in terms of false hopes and lost opportunities for effective therapy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kottow, M. H. (1992). Classical medicine v alternative medical practices. Journal of Medical Ethics, 18(1), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.18.1.18

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free