Abstract
Crystal structure determination requires solving the phase problem. This can be accomplished using ab initio direct methods for small molecules and macromolecules at resolutions higher than 1.2 Å , whereas macromolecular structure determination at lower resolution requires either molecular replacement using a homologous structure or experimental phases using a derivative such as covalent labeling (for example selenomethionine or mercury derivatization) or heavy-atom soaking (for example iodide ions). Here, a case is presented in which crystals were obtained from a 30.8 kDa protein sample and yielded a 1.6 Å resolution data set with a unit cell that could accommodate approximately 8 kDa of protein. Thus, it was unclear what had been crystallized. Molecular replacement with pieces of homologous proteins and attempts at iodide ion soaking failed to yield a solution. The crystals could not be reproduced. Sequence-independent molecular replacement using the structures available in the Protein Data Bank also failed to yield a solution. Ultimately, ab initio structure solution proved successful using the program ARCIMBOLDO, which identified two α-helical elements and yielded interpretable maps. The structure was the C-terminal dimerization domain of the intended target from Mycobacterium smegmatis. This structure is presented as a user-friendly test case in which an unknown protein fragment could be determined using ARCIMBOLDO.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Abendroth, J., Sankaran, B., Myler, P. J., Lorimer, D. D., & Edwards, T. E. (2018). Ab initio structure solution of a proteolytic fragment using ARCIMBOLDO. Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology Communications, 74(9), 530–535. https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053230X18010063
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.