Does characterising patterns of multimorbidity in stroke matter for developing collaborative care approaches in primary care?

4Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Stroke and transient ischaemic attack (TIA) remain leading causes of mortality and morbidity globally. Although mortality rates have been in decline, the number of people affected by stroke has risen. These patients have a range of long-term needs and often present to primary care. Furthermore, many of these patients have multimorbidities which increase the complexity of their healthcare. Long-term impacts from stroke/TIA along with care needs for other morbidities can be challenging to address because care can involve different healthcare professionals, both specialist and generalist. In the ideal model of care, such professionals would work collaboratively to provide care. Despite the commonality of multimorbidity in stroke/TIA, gaps in the literature remain, particularly limited knowledge of pairings or clusters of comorbid conditions and the extent to which these are interrelated. Moreover, integrated care practices are less well understood and remain variable in practice. This article argues that it is important to understand (through research) patterns of multimorbidity, including number, common clusters and types of comorbidities, and current interprofessional practice to inform future directions to improve long-term care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aquino, M. R. J. R. V., Turner, G. M., & Mant, J. (2019). Does characterising patterns of multimorbidity in stroke matter for developing collaborative care approaches in primary care? Primary Health Care Research & Development, 20, e110. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423619000240

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free