Fetal growth: A comparison of growth curves with mathematical modeling

13Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study compared the use of fetal growth curves with the Rossavik mathematical model in predicting third trimester fetal growth in 27 Hispanic patients. The parameters tested were BPD, HC, AC, and FL. The growth curve method of predicting third trimester fetal growth was significantly more accurate than the mathematical model for three of the four fetal parameters tested: BPD, HC, and FL. We conclude that the mathematical model method offered no advantage over the more commonly used growth curve method for predicting third trimester fetal growth. In addition, growth curves do not require complex calculations and are conceptually simpler and easier to use.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shields, L. E., Huff, R. W., Jackson, G. M., Olive, D. L., & Patterson, R. M. (1993). Fetal growth: A comparison of growth curves with mathematical modeling. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 12(5), 271–274. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.1993.12.5.271

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free