Anti-Immigration Policy and Mental Health: Risk of Distress and Trauma Among Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Recipients in the United States

21Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: This study examined the association between immigration legal status and distress from the announcement of the termination of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program among individuals affected by this potentially traumatic event (PTE), along with identifying relevant risk factors. Method: Participants (N = 233) affected by the termination announcement provided crosssectional self-reports on distress from the announcement that was measured using the Impact of Events Scale—Revised. Results: Of the participants, 40.7% met the clinical cutoff for distress from the PTE indicative of posttraumatic stress disorder. DACA recipients had significantly higher levels of distress from the PTE compared with non-DACA undocumented immigrants and documented counterparts, X2(2, N = 233) = 23.25, p,.001. After controlling for covariates, being a DACA recipient (OR = 4.11, 95% confidence interval [1.99, 8.50], p,.001), being male (OR = 2.06, [1.05, 4.03], p =.035), and having lower financial security (OR =.54, [.38,.75], p,.001) were significantly associated with distress. Conclusion: The future of DACA recipients is uncertain, which can be trauma inducing. The field of psychology needs to make space for this kind of experience as potentially traumatic. Advocacy efforts to shift immigration policies can be strengthened to alter the negative effects of the potential termination of DACA on those affected by it.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Garcini, L. M., Rodríguez, M. M. D., Mercado, A., Silva, M., Cadenas, G., Galvan, T., & Paris, M. (2022). Anti-Immigration Policy and Mental Health: Risk of Distress and Trauma Among Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Recipients in the United States. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 15(7), 1067–1075. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001228

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free