Enhancement of a prosthetic knee with a microprocessor-controlled gait phase switch reduces falls and improves balance confidence and gait speed in community ambulators with unilateral transfemoral amputation

24Citations
Citations of this article
159Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Despite the evidence for improved safety and function of microprocessor stance and swing-controlled prosthetic knees, non-microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees are still standard of care for persons with transfemoral amputations in most countries. Limited feature microprocessor-control enhancement of such knees could stand to significantly improve patient outcomes. Objectives: To evaluate gait speed, balance, and fall reduction benefits of the new 3E80 default stance hydraulic knee compared to standard non-microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees. Study design: Comparative within-subject clinical study. Methods: A total of 13 young, high-functioning community ambulators with a transfemoral amputation underwent assessment of performance-based (e.g. 2-min walk test, timed ramp/stair tests) and self-reported (e.g. falls, Activities-Specific Balance Confidence scale, Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire question #1, Satisfaction with the Prosthesis) outcome measures for their non-microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees and again after 8 weeks of accommodation to the 3E80 microprocessor–enhanced knee. Results: Self-reported falls significantly declined 77% (p =.04), Activities-Specific Balance Confidence scores improved 12 points (p =.005), 2-min walk test walking distance increased 20 m on level (p =.01) and uneven (p =.045) terrain, and patient satisfaction significantly improved (p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fuenzalida Squella, S. A., Kannenberg, A., & Brandão Benetti, Â. (2018). Enhancement of a prosthetic knee with a microprocessor-controlled gait phase switch reduces falls and improves balance confidence and gait speed in community ambulators with unilateral transfemoral amputation. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 42(2), 228–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309364617716207

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free