Context, compositionality and calamity

3Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper examines an attempt made in a series of articles (Stanley, 2002, et al.) to create a syntactic placeholder for contextual information. The initial shortcoming of Stanley's proposal is that it does not easily integrate these placeholders with domain-restricting information syntactically encoded elsewhere in the utterance. Thus, Stanley makes erroneous predictions in the case of sentences in which quantifier-restricting information encoded in (for example) a prepositional phrase conflicts with quantifier-restriction valued by context is internally incoherent. I explore the space of possible solutions that are available to Stanley, demonstrating how each results in its own interpretation problem and, ultimately, fails. In doing so, I argue that Stanley's syntactic approach to contextual restriction is untenable. Journal compilation © 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rett, J. (2006). Context, compositionality and calamity. Mind and Language, 21(5), 541–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00294.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free