Abstract
Children struggle with the interpretation of pronouns in direct speech (Ann said, I get a cookie), but not in indirect speech (Ann said that she gets a cookie) (Köder & Maier, 2016). Yet children's books consistently favor direct over indirect speech (Baker & Freebody, 1989). To reconcile these seemingly contradictory findings, we hypothesize that the poor performance found by Köder and Maier (2016) is due to the information-Transmission setting of that experiment, and that a narrative setting facilitates children's processing of direct speech. We tested 42 Dutch children (4;1-7;2) and 20 adults with a modified version of Köder and Maier's referent selection task, where participants interpret speech reports in an interactive story book. Results confirm our hypothesis: children are much better at interpreting pronouns in direct speech in such a narrative setting than they were in an information-Transmission setting. This indicates that the pragmatic context of reports affects their processing effort.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Köder, F., & Maier, E. (2018). The advantage of story-Telling: Children’s interpretation of reported speech in narratives. Journal of Child Language, 45(2), 541–557. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000917000344
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.