The advantage of story-Telling: Children's interpretation of reported speech in narratives

6Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Children struggle with the interpretation of pronouns in direct speech (Ann said, I get a cookie), but not in indirect speech (Ann said that she gets a cookie) (Köder & Maier, 2016). Yet children's books consistently favor direct over indirect speech (Baker & Freebody, 1989). To reconcile these seemingly contradictory findings, we hypothesize that the poor performance found by Köder and Maier (2016) is due to the information-Transmission setting of that experiment, and that a narrative setting facilitates children's processing of direct speech. We tested 42 Dutch children (4;1-7;2) and 20 adults with a modified version of Köder and Maier's referent selection task, where participants interpret speech reports in an interactive story book. Results confirm our hypothesis: children are much better at interpreting pronouns in direct speech in such a narrative setting than they were in an information-Transmission setting. This indicates that the pragmatic context of reports affects their processing effort.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Köder, F., & Maier, E. (2018). The advantage of story-Telling: Children’s interpretation of reported speech in narratives. Journal of Child Language, 45(2), 541–557. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000917000344

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free