Mid- to long-term outcomes after weber b-type ankle fractures with and without syndesmotic rupture

13Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background/Aim: The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of syndesmotic screw fixation on overall clinical outcomes following Weber B-type ankle fractures. Materials and Methods: A total of 21 patients with syndesmotic rupture requiring screw fixation were compared to 40 patients with an intact syndesmosis. Olerud-Molander-Ankle-Score, American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle hindfoot score, and the Short Form Health Survey-36 were recorded. Weight-bearing plain radiographs were performed to rate post traumatic osteoarthrosis according to the Kellgren-Lawrence score. Pain levels were evaluated with a visual analog scale. Results: A total of 61 patients with a mean follow-up of 6.6 years (range=2-12 years) satisfied the inclusion criteria. Pain level, clinical outcome scores, and radiographs did not reveal significant differences between the groups. Ankle joints with syndesmotic rupture showed a significant restriction in dorsiflexion compared to those with an intact syndesmosis (15 vs. 20, p=0.028). Conclusion: Syndesmotic rupture does not affect clinical and radiological outcome parameters following Weber B-type ankle fractures, but does lead to a significant restriction in dorsiflexion of the ankle joint.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kohake, M. B. J., Wiebking, U., O’Loughlin, P. F., Krettek, C., & Gaulke, R. (2019). Mid- to long-term outcomes after weber b-type ankle fractures with and without syndesmotic rupture. In Vivo, 33(1), 255–261. https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.11469

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free