Identifying and prioritising barriers to injury care in Northern Malawi, results of a multifacility multidisciplinary health facility staff survey

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction The burden of injuries globally and in Malawi is substantial. Optimising both access to, and quality of, care in health systems requires attention. We aimed to establish how health facility staff in Karonga, Malawi, perceive barriers to seeking (delay 1), reaching (delay 2) and receiving (delay 3) injury care. Method We conducted a cross-sectional survey of health facility staff who treat patients with injuries in all health facilities serving the Karonga Demographic Surveillance Site population. The primary outcome was participant perceptions of the importance of delays 1 to 3 following injury. Secondary outcomes were the barriers within each of these delays considered most important and which were considered the most important across all delays stages. Results 228 staff completed the survey: 36.8% (84/228) were female and 61.4% (140/228) reported being involved in caring for an injured person at least weekly. Delay 3 was most frequently considered the most important delay 35.1% (80/228), with 19.3% (44/228) and 16.6% (38/ 228) reporting delays 1 and 2 as the most important respectively; 28.9% (66/228) of respondents either did not know or answer. For delay 1 the barrier, “the perceived financial costs associated with seeking care are too great”, was considered most important. For delay 2, the barrier “lack of timely affordable emergency transport (formal or informal)” was considered most important. For delay 3, the barrier, “lack of reliably available necessary physical resources (infrastructure, equipment and consumable material)” was considered most important. When considering the most important overall barrier across all delays, the delay 3 barrier, “lack of reliably available necessary physical resources” received the most nominations (41.7% [95/228]). Conclusions Given the awareness of health facility staff of the issues facing their patients, these findings should assist in informing health system planning.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Whitaker, J., Njawala, T., Nyirenda, V., Amoah, A. S., Dube, A., Chirwa, L., … Davies, J. (2024). Identifying and prioritising barriers to injury care in Northern Malawi, results of a multifacility multidisciplinary health facility staff survey. PLoS ONE, 19(9 September). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308525

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free