Does the Cost-Cutting Strategy of Closing Public Schools Provide Financial Benefits? Evidence From Ohio

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

From 1995 through 2014, 15 percent of school districts nationwide closed at least one school without opening any new school. Although budgetary constraints have been claimed as a major reason to close a public school, no empirical study has examined the financial benefits of school closures. This study finds that Ohio school closures reduce an average district's total operating expenditures by $278–$285 per pupil, and that savings come primarily from cuts in classroom instructional services, including teachers. This study provides empirical evidence on the financial implications of school closings needed for stakeholders involved in a school closing process.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nguyen-Hoang, P. (2019). Does the Cost-Cutting Strategy of Closing Public Schools Provide Financial Benefits? Evidence From Ohio. Public Budgeting and Finance, 39(3), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.12236

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free