Abstract
Background: Halothane is made and used as a racemate (an equimolar mixture of R- and S- enantiomers). This study was initiated to determine whether there were demonstrable enantiomeric differences in the whole-body pharmacokinetics of halothane that might have significance for studies in which racemate is used. Methods: Adult male Wistar rats were exposed to halothane vaporized in the atmosphere of a dosed constant volume chamber supplied with O2 commensurate with CO2 production. Concentrations of halothane enantiomers were measured by a specific gas chromatography-mass spectrometry method. Experiments were performed at four initial concentrations of halothane (0.1%, 0.5%, 1.0%, and 1.5% vol/vol). Enantiomeric differences in whole-body pharmacokinetics were assessed indirectly from the relative chamber atmosphere concentrations of halothane enantiomers. Results: Concentrations of halothane decreased biphasically. The initial more rapid decrease was interpreted as incorporating absorption, distribution, and clearance; the slower decrease was interpreted as principally incorporating metabolic clearance. The ratio of concentrations of the two halothane enantiomers and of the ratios of the respective areas under the concentration-time curves remained constant without differing from unity at any time at any concentration of halothane. The dose-normalized areas under the concentration-time curves for the concentrations 0.1%, 0.5%, and 1.0% did not differ; that for 1.5% was significantly greater, suggesting nonlinear clearance, but the values did not differ significantly between enantiomers at any concentration. Conclusions: As there were no significant differences in concentrations of the two enantiomers in the chamber atmosphere, enantioselectivity was not demonstrated in the whole-body pharmacokinetics of halothane.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Mather, L. E., Fryirs, B. L., Duke, C. C., & Cousins, M. J. (2000). Lack of whole-body pharmacokinetic differences of halothane enantiomers in the rat. Anesthesiology, 92(1), 190–196. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200001000-00031
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.