Autonomía y pacientes reclusos

  • García-Guerrero J
  • Bellver-Capella V
  • Blanco-Sueiro R
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The authors study a recent Spanish High Court decision declaring liability on the Administration’s part for the death of an inmate in a prison hospital. We analyse the Court’s decision using legal, ethical, medical and social perspectives. The conclusions are that: 1. the Administration has no legitimate right to force a prisoner to take medical treatment, except in circumstances in which there is a grave and definite risk to the patient’s life, or when the patient lacks capacity or when there is the risk of harm to the health of third parties; 2. That in the case of health decision making that might affect a patient, the Court has mounted a frontal attack on the autonomy of patients in prison; 3. That from a medical point of view the decision is discriminatory since it does not apply the same standards of measurement to all chronic illnesses that might be found in the prison context; 4. That it is inapplicable in daily practice due to the fact that its strictness of application would seriously affect the already highly fragile ordered coexistence that exists in a prison.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

García-Guerrero, J., Bellver-Capella, V., Blanco-Sueiro, R., Galán-Cortés, J. C., Mínguez-Gallego, C., & Serrat-Moré, D. (2007). Autonomía y pacientes reclusos. Revista Española de Sanidad Penitenciaria, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.4321/s1575-06202007000200004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free