Abstract
The authors study a recent Spanish High Court decision declaring liability on the Administration’s part for the death of an inmate in a prison hospital. We analyse the Court’s decision using legal, ethical, medical and social perspectives. The conclusions are that: 1. the Administration has no legitimate right to force a prisoner to take medical treatment, except in circumstances in which there is a grave and definite risk to the patient’s life, or when the patient lacks capacity or when there is the risk of harm to the health of third parties; 2. That in the case of health decision making that might affect a patient, the Court has mounted a frontal attack on the autonomy of patients in prison; 3. That from a medical point of view the decision is discriminatory since it does not apply the same standards of measurement to all chronic illnesses that might be found in the prison context; 4. That it is inapplicable in daily practice due to the fact that its strictness of application would seriously affect the already highly fragile ordered coexistence that exists in a prison.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
García-Guerrero, J., Bellver-Capella, V., Blanco-Sueiro, R., Galán-Cortés, J. C., Mínguez-Gallego, C., & Serrat-Moré, D. (2007). Autonomía y pacientes reclusos. Revista Española de Sanidad Penitenciaria, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.4321/s1575-06202007000200004
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.