Clinical Reasoning: Where Do We Stand on Identifying and Remediating Difficulties?

  • Audétat M
  • Lubarsky S
  • Blais J
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Ten to fifteen percent of medical trainees have academic difficulties, the majority of which are cognitive in nature, including clinical reasoning. Many obstacles impede the rapid identification of clinical reason-ing difficulties in medical learners. This article reviews the literature on detection and remediation of clinical reasoning difficulties, and offers specific, practical steps for accurately diagnosing and quickly resolving identified problems with clinical reasoning. Faculties need to become more involved in the de-velopment and establishment of tools for encouraging direct observation of the development of clinical reasoning in medical learners, and for strengthening the teachers' pedagogical competencies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Audétat, M.-C., Lubarsky, S., Blais, J.-G., & Charlin, B. (2013). Clinical Reasoning: Where Do We Stand on Identifying and Remediating Difficulties? Creative Education, 04(06), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.46a008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free