AN APPRAISAL OF PREFERENCE FOR MULTIPLE versus MIXED SCHEDULES 1

  • Hursh S
  • Fantino E
25Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Pigeons' choice responses on either of two keys occasionally produced entry into a terminal link associated with that key. During the terminal links, responses produced access to grain according to mixed‐ or multiple‐interval schedules. The multiple schedules provided stimuli correlated with the interval of time preceding reinforcement whereas the mixed schedules did not. The two subjects reliably preferred the multiple schedules to the mixed schedules throughout a series of replications. Preference for the multiple schedule was much smaller than suggested by earlier work comparing multiple and mixed schedules that had much higher rates of entry into the terminal links. Preference for the multiple schedule was greatly increased in this study when the rate of entry into the terminal schedules was increased. As in previous studies, these high preferences may have been the result of a sharp increase in the number of reinforcements on the multiple (as opposed to the mixed) schedule. The reliable but smaller preferences for the multiple schedule found with lower rates of entry into the terminal links were unconfounded by differences in the number of reinforcements obtained in the two terminal links.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hursh, S. R., & Fantino, E. (1974). AN APPRAISAL OF PREFERENCE FOR MULTIPLE versus MIXED SCHEDULES 1. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1974.22-31

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free