Intensive care admission triage during a pandemic: A survey of the acceptability of triage tools

7Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We conducted a survey of the UK Intensive Care Society regarding physician opinion of national guidance on ICU triage during a viral pandemic. Respondents graded agreement for seventeen triage criteria, ten from the Department of Health. We determined whether respondents accepted the whole tool on the basis of proportion of criteria agreed with. A modified tool was devised and acceptability compared. Five hundred and fifty questionnaires were returned (33.1% from senior physicians). Approximately half of senior physicians (49.5%) and 44.4% of other respondents found the tool acceptable. This improved to 68.7% and 59.2% for the modified tool. Chi-square analysis revealed no statistically significant difference between the opinions of senior physicians and other respondents (p=0.850 for the original tool, p=0.593 for the modified tool). A small change to the government guidelines produced a tool with improved acceptability among ICU physicians. © The Intensive Care Society 2011.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ashton-Cleary, D., Tillyard, A., & Freeman, N. (2011). Intensive care admission triage during a pandemic: A survey of the acceptability of triage tools. Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 12(3), 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/175114371101200303

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free