Work(ing) artefacts: Tools of the trade, totems or trophies?

21Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Do workplace artefacts have utility for their custodians beyond the workplace context? A new materiality perspective allowed the conversation to move beyond the parameters of the organisation and into the private spheres of both practicing and retired para-professionals. In this study of chefs, we discover the deliberate acquisition of occupational artefacts beyond their organisational utility. These artefacts betray a post-occupational identity deeply revelatory of materiality. We ask in what ways are these artefacts symbolic, or totemic? Findings provide fresh insights into how artefacts are mobilised as reverent ‘working’ objects, as totems and trophies for nostalgia. This facilitates reflections on how work was or ought to be, and so in turn who or ‘what I am’ or ‘who I was’. Theoretically, this enables us to extend the nexus of materiality and work and materiality and everyday life over both time and place.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Robinson, R. N. S., & Baum, T. (2020). Work(ing) artefacts: Tools of the trade, totems or trophies? Human Relations, 73(2), 165–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719828447

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free