Abstract
The way in which research funding is allocated by both governmental and non-governmental research agencies needs to be revamped to avoid bias and encourage innovation. Known biases in allocation of funding include those driven by gender, race, institution size, geographic location and interdisciplinary study. We also contend that the peer-review process itself provides an apparently fair process, but that the flaws within it work against funding innovative science. We propose an unbiased process that combines the use of short proposals, blinded review and a lottery to allocate funding.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Winder, L., & Hodge, S. (2017). A manifesto for fair and equitable research funding in ecology. Rethinking Ecology, 2, 47–56. https://doi.org/10.3897/rethinkingecology.2.21798
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.