Reinforcement Learning for Portfolio Management

  • Singh P
  • Sharma P
  • Gupta Y
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
107Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this thesis, we develop a comprehensive account of the expressive power, modelling efficiency, and performance advantages of so-called trading agents (i.e., Deep Soft Recurrent Q-Network (DSRQN) and Mixture of Score Machines (MSM)), based on both traditional system identification (model-based approach) as well as on context-independent agents (model-free approach). The analysis provides conclusive support for the ability of model-free reinforcement learning methods to act as universal trading agents, which are not only capable of reducing the computational and memory complexity (owing to their linear scaling with the size of the universe), but also serve as generalizing strategies across assets and markets, regardless of the trading universe on which they have been trained. The relatively low volume of daily returns in financial market data is addressed via data augmentation (a generative approach) and a choice of pre-training strategies, both of which are validated against current state-of-the-art models. For rigour, a risk-sensitive framework which includes transaction costs is considered, and its performance advantages are demonstrated in a variety of scenarios, from synthetic time-series (sinusoidal, sawtooth and chirp waves), simulated market series (surrogate data based), through to real market data (S\&P 500 and EURO STOXX 50). The analysis and simulations confirm the superiority of universal model-free reinforcement learning agents over current portfolio management model in asset allocation strategies, with the achieved performance advantage of as much as 9.2\% in annualized cumulative returns and 13.4\% in annualized Sharpe Ratio.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Singh, P., Sharma, P., Gupta, Y., & Massey, S. (2025). Reinforcement Learning for Portfolio Management. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 6(4), 10374–10377. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.6.0425.1599

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free