Thought experiments in teaching free-fall weightlessness: A critical review and an exploration of Mercury's behavior in "falling elevator"

1Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Different "thought experiments" dominate teaching approaches to weightlessness, reducing students' opportunities for active physics learning, which should include observations, descriptions, explanations and predictions of real phenomena. Besides the controversy related to conceptual definitions of weight and weightlessness, we report another controversy regarding the position of the person that weighs herself or himself in a freely-falling elevator, a "thought experiment" commonly used for introducing the concept of weightlessness. Two XIX-century "thought experiments", one from America and one from Russia, show that they have a long tradition in physics teaching. We explored experimentally a "thought experiment" that deals with the behavior of a mercury drop in a freely-falling elevator. Our experimental results show that the mercury drop neither took the expected spherical shape nor performed oscillatory motions predicted by theory. Teachers should encourage students to enrich active learning of weightlessness by thinking how to test experimentally the answers to some conceptual questions, a subclass of "thought experiments".

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Balukovic, J., Slisko, J., & Cruz, A. C. (2017). Thought experiments in teaching free-fall weightlessness: A critical review and an exploration of Mercury’s behavior in “falling elevator.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(5), 1283–1311. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00671a

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free