Vigilance decrement and enhancement techniques: A review

83Citations
Citations of this article
141Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper presents the first comprehensive review on vigilance enhancement using both conventional and unconventional means, and further discusses the resulting contradictory findings. It highlights the key differences observed between the research findings and argues that variations of the experimental protocol could be a significant contributing factor towards such contradictory results. Furthermore, the paper reveals the effectiveness of unconventional means of enhancement in significant reduction of vigilance decrement compared to conventional means. Meanwhile, a discussion on the challenges of enhancement techniques is presented, with several suggested recommendations and alternative strategies to maintain an adequate level of vigilance for the task at hand. Additionally, this review provides evidence in support of the use of unconventional means of enhancement on vigilance studies, regardless of their practical challenges.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Al-shargie, F., Tariq, U., Mir, H., Alawar, H., Babiloni, F., & Al-nashash, H. (2019, August 1). Vigilance decrement and enhancement techniques: A review. Brain Sciences. MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9080178

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free