Comparative Analysis of a Financial Performance on Conventional Banks and Sharia Banks in Indonesia

  • Yulianto W
  • Wildaniyati A
  • Rochman F
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The goal of this analysis was to ascertain the financial output differences of traditional banks and Sharia banks throughout 2014-2018. The collected data in this analysis were secondary data from the financial statements issued by Bank Indonesia. The sampling methodology used in this analysis was for the purposive sampling, so the samples used were 4 samples of traditional banks and 4 samples of Sharia banks taken from conventional banks, which included state-owned banks and Sharia banks with the highest reserves. The analysis technique used to compare the financial results of conventional banks and Sharia banks is the Independent sample t-test method. Performance comparison is measured by financial ratios consisting of CAR, BOPO, ROA, NPL and LDR. The results showed that conventional banks performed better in terms of BOPO, ROA, NPL ratios, while Sharia banks performed better in terms of CAR and LDR ratios.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yulianto, W. D., Wildaniyati, A., & Rochman, F. (2021). Comparative Analysis of a Financial Performance on Conventional Banks and Sharia Banks in Indonesia. In Proceedings of the 7th Regional Accounting Conference (KRA 2020) (Vol. 173). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.210416.024

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free