Functional outcomes of glansectomy to treat localised penile cancer: a systematic review

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Glansectomy with or without a neoglans reconstruction is commonly performed for invasive penile cancer confined to the glans penis. The aim of penile-preserving procedures is to maintain sexual and urinary function without compromising oncological outcomes. A systematic review was performed to evaluate the functional outcomes following glansectomy. Overall, 14 studies which included 327 glansectomy procedures were analysed. At a mean follow-up of 40.7 (range, 13–52) months, the recurrence rate was 9.1% (0–25%) and the disease-specific survival rate was 87.5–100%. Partial graft loss and meatal stenosis occurred in 6.1% (0–17.6%) and 8.1% (0–14.3%) respectively. 91.1% (50–100%) had preserved erectile function and 62.5% (33.3–100%) were sexually active. 75.6% (66.7–100%) of patients were voiding whilst standing up and 83.7% (63.6–91.2%) had maintained glans sensation. Satisfaction with the overall appearance was achieved in 86.3% (68.2–100%). The reporting of functional outcomes was heterogenous with a limitation that there are no standardised guidelines on the assessment of functional outcomes following glansectomy. Further research should focus on identifying appropriate tools for reporting functional outcomes following glansectomy and standardising reporting.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pang, K. H., Alnajjar, H. M., & Muneer, A. (2026, March 1). Functional outcomes of glansectomy to treat localised penile cancer: a systematic review. International Journal of Impotence Research. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-025-01062-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free