Eicosapantaenoic acid treatment based on the epa/aa ratio in patients with coronary artery disease: Follow-up data from the tochigi ryomo epa/aa trial in coronary artery disease (treat-cad) study

13Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) administration has been reported to decrease the incidence of cardiovascular events, and the serum EPA/arachidonic acid (AA) ratio has been identified as a potential new risk marker for coronary artery disease (CAD). The present study aimed to investigate the value of EPA treatment based on the EPA/AA ratio at baseline. We retrospectively analyzed clinical outcome data from 149 CAD patients with a baseline EPA/AA ratio ≤ 0.4 who had received purified EPA (EPA group) or not (no EPA group) and CAD patients with an EPA/AA ratio > 0.4 who had not received EPA (control group). The baseline EPA/AA ratios were similar in the EPA and no EPA groups and were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.0001). The EPA/AA ratio significantly increased in the EPA group (P < 0.0001) and the no EPA group (P < 0.001) but not in the control group. The cumulative incidence of cardiovascular death tended to be lower in the EPA group (log-rank test: P = 0.07). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that the cut-off value of the target EPA/AA ratio after EPA treatment for all-cause death was 1.23 (AUC = 0.85, P = 0.016). These results suggest that EPA treatment may improve the long-term prognosis in CAD patients with an EPA/AA ratio ≤ 0.4 and that an EPA/AA ratio > 1.2 may be an appropriate EPA treatment target value to reduce mortality.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abe, S., Sugimura, H., Watanabe, S., Murakami, Y., Ebisawa, K., Ioka, T., … Inoue, T. (2018). Eicosapantaenoic acid treatment based on the epa/aa ratio in patients with coronary artery disease: Follow-up data from the tochigi ryomo epa/aa trial in coronary artery disease (treat-cad) study. Hypertension Research, 41(11), 939–946. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-018-0102-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free