Cerebral blood flow from arterial spin labeling as an imaging biomarker of outcome after endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke

9Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Arterial spin labeling (ASL) is a contrast agent-free magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique to measure cerebral blood flow (CBF). We sought to investigate effects of CBF within the infarct on outcome and risk of hemorrhagic transformation (HT). In 111 patients (median age: 74 years, 50 men) who had undergone mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for ischemic stroke of the anterior circulation (median interval: 4 days between MT and MRI), post-stroke %CBF difference from pseudo-continuous ASL was calculated within the diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-positive infarct territory following lesion segmentation in relationship to the unaffected contralateral side. Functional independence was defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 0–2 at 90 days post-stroke. %CBF difference, pre-stroke mRS, and infarct volume were independently associated with functional independence in a multivariate regression model. %CBF difference was comparable between patients with and without HT. A subcohort of 10 patients with decreased infarct-CBF despite expanded Treatment in Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) 2c or 3 recanalization was identified (likely related to the no-reflow phenomenon). Outcome was significantly worse in this group compared to the remaining cohort. In conclusion, ASL-derived %CBF difference from the DWI-positive infarct territory independently predicted functional independence, but %CBF difference was not significantly associated with an increased risk of HT.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hernandez Petzsche, M. R., Bürkle, J., Hoffmann, G., Zimmer, C., Rühling, S., Schwarting, J., … Sollmann, N. (2025). Cerebral blood flow from arterial spin labeling as an imaging biomarker of outcome after endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 45(2), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X241267066

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free