Indeterminism is a modal notion: Branching spacetimes and Earman's pruning

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The paper defends an Aristotelian notion of indeterminism, as rigorously formulated in the framework of branching space-times (BST) of Belnap (1992), against criticism by Earman's (2008) based on a model-theoretic characterization of indeterminism. It delineates BST branching against the background provided by Earman's (2008) distinction between individual versus ensemble branching. Partly in order to motivate our responses to Earman, it describes a construction of physically motivated BST models, in which histories are isomorphic to Minkowski spacetime. Finally it responds to Earman's criticisms leveled against BST by addressing a topological issue, the question of an actual future, the past/future asymmetry, and some semantical questions. © 2010 The Author(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Placek, T., & Belnap, N. (2012). Indeterminism is a modal notion: Branching spacetimes and Earman’s pruning. Synthese, 187(2), 441–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9846-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free